Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Mini-reviews // Jackaby, Four, and Under the Egg

This is my first time trying out mini-reviews! They did come out rather long. I need to work on writing concisely, obviously. Today, we have three books, from three different genres:

Jackaby by William Ritter

20312462I don't usually read paranormal/supernatural stuff, so Jackaby was a first for me in that genre. (And now I want more of it - give me ALL THE RECOMMENDATIONS please!) The blurb said that Jackaby was Sherlock mixed with Doctor Who, and that's a pretty good description of this book. (Though I've never seen Doctor Who, so frankly I'm not one to judge.)

The whole book was quite lighthearted and fun. With this combination of mystery and paranormal, there is possibility of it going into deep freaky stuff, but Jackaby doesn't. It's too fantastical to get into the seriousness of a Sherlock mystery, and it's too playful to get into the seriousness of a paranormal horror thing.

Our character Jackaby is definitely based on Sherlock Holmes. He's got the self-centeredness, the antisocialness, all that "good" stuff that makes Holmes who he is. However, he's different enough for it not to be an issue, and anyway, I like Sherlock enough to not mind when the similarities got too large.

Our narrator is young Abigail Rook, who embodies what we all look for in a strong female character. Seriously, this girl is awesome. She's independent, but without being a know-it-all. She acknowledges that she's still young and learning, but is confident in herself. She's feminine, but not in a submissive way, and she solves her own problems. I love her!

And finally - the variety of paranormal creatures was spectacula. I really need to read more paranormal stuff, because really, all I know about are the mainstream ghosts, vampires, and werewolves.

Recommended highly! Rating it somewhere around 4.25 stars? (You know I hate star ratings.)

(OH MY GOODNESSS I just discovered there's going to be a sequel YESSS)

Four by Veronica Roth

18126198It was definitely pleasant to get back into the Divergent world, but this book was definitely for just the fans - no one else would care enough, frankly. I found it mildly unnecessary.

Frankly, I didn't like reading the Tris parts from his perspective. It felt repetitive and redundant. Been there, done that. My favorite bits were the parts about Four's backstory that hadn't been told before, the stuff I absolutely didn't know.

Also, his first date ever was awkward and hilarious and I loved it. It was the best.

Ultimately, this book was a nice addendum, but really, in my opinion, not necessary. I just didn't care.

Recommended for Divergent fans. (Though probably if you are a fan, you've read it already.)

My rating is somewhere around 4 stars. 

Hahahahah four stars hahahah get it hahaha


Under the Egg by Laura Marx Fitzgerald

18060008The fact that the blurb compared it to Chasing Vermeer and From The Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler made me desperately want to read it. I loved those two MG books as a kid, so I was excited to relive my childhood in this MG art-heist book.

Though it was quite good (with a neat little twist at the end), it didn't live up to expectations. There was a lot of diversity BUT it felt forced and somewhat stereotypical, like the author was trying to fulfill a "diversity quota." There were a lot of twists and turns BUT they smelled a bit of deus ex machina a lot of times. The author clearly knew her art and her history BUT her religious knowledge was minuscule, and made multiple errors in that department.

This book didn't have the innocent spirit and the pure goodness and the childish intrigue of those two titles it was compared to above. It was good, but somehow missed that luminescence that defines those two books, and which makes an excellent MG book differ from one that's just okay. And this one was just okay.

(If you want to read a more in-depth review of this one, you can see my guest post at Of Specatcles and Books.)

My rating is somewhere around 3.5 stars.

Have you read any of these? And any paranormal recommendations for me? I want them ALL.



  1. Eeep I must read Jackaby, I am a huge Doctor Who and Sherlock fan. I wish I had a recommendation, but I don't I do not read much paranormal, but I want to.

    1. I think you will like Jackaby very much. :-) It has strong, strong Sherlock vibes.

  2. Jackaby sounds like a really good book! I may have to check that one out. :D The other two aren't really my cup of tea, especially because I haven't read Divergent and have no plans to. Either way... I look forward to what I read. :)

    1. Yes, if you haven't read Divergent, Four is kind of dull. But Jackaby is definitely a fun ride, and I hope you like it :-)

  3. DUDE. YES. My time has come. Here are my paranormal recommendations ;)

    ~Juliet Immortal by Stacey Jacy. It's a re-telling of Romeo and Juliet (if you couldn't guess ;) ) and at first I thought I wouldn't like it because I don't like pure romance-y stuff. But this is a paranormal re-telling. It has romance and sometimes felt like it was a bit unrealistic but the ghosty stuff was pure awesome.

    ~The Coldest Girl in Coldtown by Holly Black. A vampire story but not like the vampires you see on cliche tv shows. The author is brilliant and description and there's a lot of dark vampire history you learn.

    ~Hex Hall series by Rachel Hawkins. I'm not sure if this would be our style as it uses less "timeless" style of writing and more current style. It didn't annoy me that much though. And the MC is brilliant with sarcasm.

    If I think of more, I'll make sure to tell you *grins*

    1. so...typos...lots of them...

      *The author is brilliant at description
      *I'm not sure if this would be your style (definitely wasn't being creepy and referring to us liking all things the same...)


      Coldest Girl in Coldtown is already on my TBR somehow (didn't know it was paranormal), but I will put the others on immediately! THANK YOU :-)

  4. Doctor Who and Sherlock!? DAMN. I NEED THAT BOOK IN MY LIFE. Glad to see you liked it! Yeaahh, I thought that Four was a little unnecessary too -- I liked it I just didn't really see the point in it. Although it was nice to read some of the stories form his point of view. But I read it so long after Allegiant that I'd lost a little interest in the story/characters.


      I did have a bit of a time gap between Allegiant and Four as well, so that might have affected my meh-ness too.


Book discussions make the world a better place! Write me a comment - I respond to each and every one, I promise. So check back!

(YES! I LOVE TAGS and I do them! So tag away! But no bloggerly awards, though, like the Liebster or the Sisterhood of World Bloggers. Thank you!)